STABLECOINS, CENTRAL BANK DIGITAL CURRENCIES, AND THE FUTURE OF THE MONETARY SYSTEM

Authors

  • Kurbanbayeva Marjona Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Netti Nurhayati Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Heny Hendrayati Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Inomjon Qudratov Tashkent State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58268/eb.v5i1.280

Keywords:

stablecoins, CBDC, Monetary sovereignty, financial stability, tekenisation, digital payment

Abstract

Stablecoins and central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) have moved to the center of debates on the future of money because both instruments combine technological innovation with questions of payment efficiency, monetary sovereignty, legal design, and financial stability. This article examines how private digital money in the form of stablecoins and public digital money in the form of CBDCs may reshape the monetary system. The study uses a structured qualitative review based only on the user’s original article and analyzes official publications from institutions such as the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), International Monetary Fund (IMF), Financial Stability Board (FSB), European Central Bank (ECB), CPMI-IOSCO, and selected central bank studies. The review finds that stablecoins may improve payment speed, programmability, and some cross-border transactions, but they also create risks related to reserve quality, run behavior, deposit substitution, market concentration, and foreign-currency dependence. CBDCs are being explored not simply as digital cash replacements, but as strategic public instruments that may preserve the role of central bank money, support competition in payments, and strengthen resilience in a more tokenised financial environment. The article argues that the most plausible future is not a single dominant form of digital money, but a hybrid architecture in which cash, reserves, bank deposits, tokenised deposits, regulated stablecoins, fast payment systems, and selected forms of CBDC coexist. The main policy implication is that public money must remain the anchor of trust in digital environments while private innovation develops within a strong framework of interoperability, prudential safeguards, and consumer protection.

References

Ahmed, R. (2025). Stablecoins and safe asset prices *. 1–32.

Ahmed, R., Aldasoro, I., & Duley, C. (2025). Public information and stablecoin runs. BIS Working Papers, 2024(1164).

Ante, L., Fiedler, I., Willruth, J. M., & Steinmetz, F. (2023). A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Research on Stablecoins. FinTech, 34–47.

Buchan, J., & Üngör, M. (2026). Monetary sovereignty in the digital age : the role of Central bank digital currencies. International Journal of Political Economy, 0(0), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911916.2026.2624900

Cengiz, F. (2025). Stablecoins and their regulation : a Hayekian approach. Journal of International Economic Law, 00(00), 204–223. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgaf014

Chiu, J. (2024). Public and private money creation for distributed ledgers: Stablecoins, tokenized deposits, or central bank digital currencies? Staff Working Paper.

Demirgüç-Kunt, A. (2021). Financial Inclusion, Digital Payments, and Resilience in the Age of COVID-19. World Bank Group.

Ianenko, M., Ianenko, M., Huhlaev, D., & Martynenko, O. (2019). Digital transformation of trade: Problems and prospects of marketing activities. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 497(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/497/1/012118

Kochergin. (2019). Central bank Digital Currencies: Key Characteristics and Directions of Influence on Monetary and Credit and Payment Systems. FINANCE: THEORY AND PRACTICE, 74(045), 80–98. https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2019-23-4-80-98

Kochergin. (2020). Economic Nature and Classification of Stablecoins. FINANCE: THEORY AND PRACTICE, 76(045), 140–160. https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2020-24-6-140-160

Kosse, A., & Mattei, I. (2023). Making headway – Results of the 2022 BIS survey on central bank digital currencies and crypto. BIS Papers, 136.

Kristoufek, L. (2022). On the role of stablecoins in cryptoasset pricing dynamics. Financial Innovation, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-022-00343-8

Nasiba, K. (2024). Navigating The Ethical Landscape Of Digital Currencies. Texas Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 39(December), 42–45.

Nikolaou, I., Vakola, M., & Bourantas, D. (2008). Who speaks up at work? Dispositional influences on employees’ voice behavior. Personnel Review, 37(6), 666–679. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480810906892

Oommen, E. (2024). The Economics of Digital Currencies : Implications for Financial Systems and Economic Policy. Journal of Research & Development’ A Multidisciplinary International Level Referred and Peer Reviewed Journal, 11.

Papadopoulos, A. G., & Fratsea, L. (2023). ( NON- ) INSTITUTIONAL MANIFESTATIONS OF MIGRANT INFRASTRUCTURES FOR REFUGEES. Europa XXI, 44, 57–73.

Shin, J. I., Chung, K. H., Oh, J. S., & Lee, C. W. (2013). The effect of site quality on repurchase intention in Internet shopping through mediating variables: The case of university students in South Korea. International Journal of Information Management, 33(3), 453–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.02.003

Tang, M. (2024). A Comparative Study of ABRSM and the Chinese Piano Examination. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 26, 698–703. https://doi.org/10.54097/9rt2bq63

Utami, W. A., Rikza, A., Anggresta, P., & Nuryananda, P. F. (2022). The Role of Institutional Collaboration Between Actors in Protecting the Economic Security of Indonesian Migrant Workers With Financial Literacy. Jurnal Bina Praja, 14, 373–383.

Wilson, G., Johnson, O., & Brown, W. (2024). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Digital Marketing Strategies Marketing Strategies. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202408.0276.v1

Zeb, A., Sheikh, M., Khan, A. A., Ali, M., & Engineering, C. S. (2025). FinTech 4.0 and the Future of Global Finance: Blockchain, Artificial Intelligence, and Big Data as Catalysts of Digital Financial Innovation. Research Journal for Social Affairs, 03(06), 377–395. https://doi.org/10.71317/RJSA.003.06.0463

Published

2026-03-15